Login

Online Users

None

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Is Wahhabism Merely An Aberation In Contemporary Islamic Thought?

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010 by JamalH

Many Westerners are still living in fool’s paradise, buying the apologist’s soft-sold idea that Wahhabism is a minority view of the Islamic world. The reality indicates that the situation is just the other way around. The proliferation of Wahhabistic philosophy is so widespread all across the globe that it can hardly be considered an aberration. From Pakistan to Qatar, from Bangladesh to Afghanistan, the common belief system among Muslim masses is very close to Wahhabite ideology. Ironically, this was not quite so in the yester years. Thirty-five years ago, before the oil boom made the Arabian Peninsula into an economic giant, Arab countries did not have any political leverage on Muslims dwelling in the countries of South Asia–countries whose populations constitute the majority of the people of the Islamic world. Islam was the religion of Mughal emperors, who ruled India for two hundred years. The Mughals were not keen on imposing Sha’ria law in the kingdom. If Islam in its pure form is intolerant and anti-pluralistic, the Islam practiced under Mughal raj was far from this characteristic. The same was true in Indonesia, Malaysia, and even in Afghanistan only a few decades ago.
In this regard, I can give an analogy. It is as if a poisonous snake went into hibernation during all these years. The Seventh Century’s Islam did not have tentacles long enough to control and purify all the localized and “impure” versions of the religion prevalent among non-Arab Muslims spread all around the world. There was Sufism in the Indian subcontinent–a brand of Islam which was perceived as nothing but heresy by the Wahhabists. Then, there was “Europeanized” Islam in the Balkans and former Soviet Union–a version of Islam which evolved into a highly liberalized brand, deviating from the puritanical form of Islam.

After liquid gold was discovered in Saudi Arabia and after the Westerners made the Arabs rich overnight, the imperialistic ambition of Arab Islamists evolved in a very short time. During the course of this development, the Westerners kept a blind eye to Arab imperialism because, to many Western strategists, export of Arab Islamic imperialism was an antidote to the spread of Communism. Thus, the sleeping snake woke up and the world changed forever.

I would like to emphasize that the philosophical war is a crucial factor in present-day global political discourse. Winning the war is not merely a PR exigency; the need to convince the constituencies is no less important. A political-regime change, even if a peaceful transformation, could turn out to be hostile to freedom and constitutional democracy. Islamic apologists of our time would say, to be true to the spirit of democracy (popular elections and majority rule), every one should adhere to the people’s wishes expressed at the polls, even if the voters choose the Islamists to govern the country. Their argument would be, if people give a mandate to rule to victors with a theocratic agenda, we should all support pursuit of that agenda. That is the reason why many are critical of U.S.A.’s role in Iraq, where they are apprehensive about Uncle Sam’s intentions, as regards possibility of an election victory for the theocrats.

Today, if anyone wants to analyze the political philosophy of Islamist parties in any Third World Muslim majority country, what will he or she encounter? Almost one hundred percent Islamist parties follow almost one hundred percent the dictums of Wahhabism. The present situation in Baluchistan and North West Frontier Province in Pakistan should be an eye opener. Through peaceful means at the polls, the Pakistani people expressed their wishes. They vowed to turn these regions into a Wahhabite utopia. Step-by-step, these provinces are veering to the direction of Afghan- istan under the Taliban. In Bangladesh, there is hardly any Islamic political group which is propagating anything other than the need to establish and maintain a Sha’ria-based society. Moreover, their organizational bases are being strengthened as the days go by. Although many Muslim countries are not fully theocratic, the family law being practiced in most of these nations is either Islamic law or Sha’ria-based law. In essence, Sha’ria already has a foothold in most of the Muslim societies of the world. Even in a country like Malaysia, a divorcing Muslim woman has to face all the hurdles of Islamic jurisprudence. It is only a matter of time when the process of Islamization (read Wahhabization) in all the Muslim countries will be completed.

The philosophy of Wahhabism is nothing but the theology and ideology of Islam in its original form–the form of Islam which continued until the rein of the Four Caliphs. The present trend on the global Islamic scene is like reverting to the roots of Islam. In addition to transforming Islamic politics through the electoral process, Wahhabism has started to dominate most of the Muslim insurgencies. Once upon a time, secular nationalists led the Kashmiri independence movement. Today, this is more or less a Wahhabite movement. We notice a parallel situation in Chechnya as well. It goes without saying that the anti-Soviet armed struggle in the Soviet-occupied Afghanistan was conducted by different factions of Wahhabite groups under the guise of freedom fighters, or Mujahedins. Adding to the list would be all the jihadist Palestinian militant organizations determined to wipe Israel off the face of our earth, following the dictum of Holy Scripture from which the Wahhabites draw inspiration.

Many American academicians dealing with the subject of Wahhabism do not have any clue as to what is going on in the Islamic world these days. They are probably living in a fool’s paradise. In America, all the socalled mainstream Islamic organizations are soft on Wahhabism. In America, almost all the mosques are run by Wahhabite Imams, who receive constant infusions of petrodollars from abroad, and, along with this money, they receive instructions as to what to say during khutba on Sabbath day prayer. It goes without saying that, in America, the backers of Wahhabism enhanced many prestigious academic institutions’ funds. That helped to form a low-key Wahhabite lobby in U.S. academia.

It is crystal clear that present-day Islam in most parts of the world, including the U.S.A. reflects pure Wahhabism. In short, there is only one face of Islam, which is visible everywhere and which resembles the old-face of Islam, or Wahhabism. The sooner we understand this plain truth, the better it will be it for mankind.

The Political System of BD

Saturday, February 27th, 2010 by uddin

The political system of Bangladesh is going back to squire no 1 that is division, non co-operation, mudslinging, vindictive and yes…Hartal. What people envisioned after the election of 2008 is almost gone and the political retribution is coming back with brute force. The killing of political leaders, contract snatching by ruling Awami League party, Campus violence, corruption, mugging and hijacking are turning out to be the day to day affairs of Bangladesh.  No matter which political party comes to power in Bangladesh, they tend to get to back to the same principal of violence. The naming of Zia International Airport and subsequent admission by the Prime Minister of Bangladesh needs to merit. During the BNP rule the name changing game was widespread everywhere.

So far, during the last 15 years or more, these two ladies ruled the country with iron fist and had no substitute for their positions. May be that’s why the country could not proceed as expected. The Parliament system of Bangladesh is not working. There is no scope for new leaders to come out and the same old back biting leaders are coming to power year after year. To fix the problem the country need to fix the fundamental problem that is the Parliament system of governance. The AL went ahead with Parliament system because India had it and they wanted to mimic their success. However to their dismay and peoples, the system is not working.  The change that was expected is not going to come from these two leaders. Their thinking, ideas are stagnant and the country needs new blood with new ideas. There needs to be a new revolution in the country that will be based on Patriotism, principals of democracy, tolerance, for the people, by the people, and economic need. The whole world is going ahead in two steps and Bangladesh is still leaping from its wounds inflicted by these so called leaders.

District Information of Bangladesh

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010 by admin

Bangladesh recently with the help of UNDP launched web portals that will disseminate District information of Bangladesh. Bangladesh is divided into 6 Divisions, 64 Districts, 6 City Corporations, 308 Municipalities, 481 Upazilas, 599 Thanas and 4498 Unions. This is undoubtedly a great initiative by the government and will help the constituents know more about their local customs, heritage, court, business, mineral and other important information online.  We hope in future the initiatives will also include the Upazila level informations. In order to look for one’s district information, a person has to type in URL: http://www.dc(districtName).gov.bd. You will need to substitute the districtName with your own district name like: dckhulna.gov.bd or dcbarisal.gov.bd. Following is a list of some of the major districts surrounding Dhaka.

1. http://www.dcdhaka.gov.bd/

2. http://www.dckhulna.gov.bd/

3. http://www.dcnoakhali.gov.bd/

4. http://www.dcsylhet.gov.bd/

5. http://www.dcbarisal.gov.bd/

6. http://www.dcchittagong.gov.bd/

7. http://www.dcrajshahi.gov.bd/

8. http://www.dcdinajpur.gov.bd/

9. http://www.dcpabna.gov.bd/

10. http://www.dccomilla.gov.bd/

11. http://www.dcmymensingh.gov.bd/

12. http://www.dcjessore.gov.bd/

13. http://www.dcpatuakhali.gov.bd/

14. http://www.dcchandpur.gov.bd/

15. http://www.dcrangamati.gov.bd/

AL or BNP, Who is better?

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 by alexh51

AL and BNP, the largest political party of Bangladesh is ruled by two rival ladies who does nothing but fight each other. Throughout their existence these two ladies hated each other like no other and in the process damaged the reputation and progress of the country to a great extend. Their rivalry is so much that if one goes to any party (except the Armed forces day party of course) the other avoids the same.
Leaders are suppose to show qualities that make them far apart from others by being compassionate, far reaching, thoughtful, patriotic and above all visionary. What we got in Bangladesh is nothing of this sort. Our two ladies are not thoughtful, patriotic only when it comes for the vote and not at all visionary. They only follow others but failed to provide any guidance for others to follow.
BNP is leaned towards Pakistan and AL is leaned towards India and their relations with these two countries take precedence over Bangladesh.  If one takes a positive idea then the other will completely cancel that even if that is meant well for the country. One example is the community clinic of AL, when BNP came to power it completely cancelled the project even though it was meant good for this country. AL on the other hand started the name game approach and started changing various named institutions that was named after Zia out of sheer jealousy. They are slowed down the Old home project for elderly that was initiated by BNP. Upazila was another project that was cancelled by BNP that was initiated by Ershad of Jatio Party.
BNP when comes to power always gives importance to the Defense forces and tries to strengthen them, AL on the other hand by virtue of its Indian leniency tries to slow the progress and make it more dependent on India. AL also recently stopped Oil and Gas exploration right to multinational companies in the Bay of Bengal blocks to satisfy its master India.
Both of these leaders failed to nurture any democratic norms in their own party even though they talk about democracy with their loud speaker. AL leader Hasina is autocratic in its own party and makes all the major decisions without any accountability or challenge. BNP leader Khaleda is supreme in her own party. She chooses all the presidium members without any challenge and consent. Both of these leaders have no future leadership opportunity for others except their own son’s and family members. It’s all about family business to them. Hasina has Joy who is as ignorant as a mule when comes to politics and BNP has Tareq who some say is the most corrupt person in Bangladesh. So who is going to lead this country when they are gone…..after all they are not immortal!
In the end Bangladesh needs a visionary and patriotic leader who can lead this country to the twentieth century. These two leaders failed in all extend to lead this country. We need new leaders and new people with different thought process. It’s about time they retire and let others lead. Otherwise the people will someday take matters in their own hand and deposed them completely.

ConocoPhillips in Bangladesh

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009 by uddin

The recent news about South Korean company Hyundai building offshore gas platform next to Bangladesh border is worrisome and could jeopardize the vast mineral resources that Bangladesh hope to explore someday. Since the platform is very near to the border of Bangladesh, chances are there that it will suck in the gas that will be found even in Bangladesh border areas. While Bangladeshi government is sitting, be sitting and chickened out to India and Myanmar, the two countries are going ahead with their own plan to explore their precious material at any cost. The AL government’s decision to award only two oil and gas fields to Conoco instead of eight actually does not bore well for the country. ConocoPhillips reportedly told they want all the eight blocks as well. Strategically it will make sense to award all the eight blocks to Conoco with a condition that they will not start any exploration in the disputed areas. But if India or Myanmar start anything in that areas then USA can with all its might intervene and bring some kind of a resolution. USA also reportedly was willing to provide joint maritime patrol in the Bay of Bengal to safeguard Bangladesh’s territory and its integrity. The past care taker government saw this from a strategic perspective and was wise to recommend awarding all the eight blocks to ConocoPhillips.

I am not sure if AL government which is so close to India, will have guts to do that for safeguarding the sovereignty of Bangladesh. Their foreign ministry and ministers are already showing its weaknesses repeatedly with their sacrificing comments. But it will be a big mistake if they fail to safeguard our national resources and the price they and the country have to pay might be dear in the long run.